Over at the Crunchy Cons blog, Rod Dreher has a post entitled “Liberty and Limited Government” in which he uses the issue of gay marriage as an example of the inherent difficulties surrounding the ideas of liberty and limited government. Needless to say, a discussion about gay marriage ensued in the comment boxes. I want to share what I posted as my “manifesto” on why I do not support gay marriage because I think that as a whole, those in favor of a traditional definition of marriage have not done a good or even honest and fair job of explaining their position. So here’s mine:
Traditional marriage served the purpose of largely confining procreation to two parent families which are the most stable, create the least need for government supervision and on average (although certainly not in all specific cases) creating the healthiest, most responsible new citizens for the perpetuation of the society. Even in cases where a couple choose not to, or were unable to procreate, marriage was still useful for ensuring that the fertile spouse would not run the risk of procreating on the “free market” and any unintentional pregnancies took place within the confines of marriage. Continue reading
